Difference between revisions of "User talk:CPalmer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(archiving; hope this works OK) |
(→Liberal deceit: new section) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Thanks - I've been trying to think of a word that would be suitable, but not come up with anything good so far. I'll add it if I do...--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:24, 12 January 2009 (EST) | :Thanks - I've been trying to think of a word that would be suitable, but not come up with anything good so far. I'll add it if I do...--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:24, 12 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Liberal deceit == | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's isn't a category, but a re-direct to [[deceit]]. The category for it, and the like is "Liberalism" which is added by the template "liberalism". --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:47, 12 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:47, January 12, 2009
Archive: 2008
Award
I am declaring you an honourary WikiGnome for all your efforts in doing the fiddly things no-one else seems to do. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 12:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Thanks! And congratulations to you on your well-deserved promotion - Conservapedia will benefit enormously from your extra powers.--CPalmer 13:23, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Thank you! Please yell if there is some way I can put these mysterious new powers to use helping you out. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 13:28, 4 January 2009 (EST)
Great addition
That's a great addition to Essay:Best New Conservative Words!!!--Andy Schlafly 10:11, 12 January 2009 (EST)
- Thanks - I've been trying to think of a word that would be suitable, but not come up with anything good so far. I'll add it if I do...--CPalmer 10:24, 12 January 2009 (EST)
Liberal deceit
That's isn't a category, but a re-direct to deceit. The category for it, and the like is "Liberalism" which is added by the template "liberalism". --₮K/Admin/Talk 15:47, 12 January 2009 (EST)