Difference between revisions of "Tax cuts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(There is nothing paradoxical about the fact that cutting tax may increase revenue.) |
m (recat) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Tax cuts''' provide a stimulus to the economy, because they reduce the cost of doing business and allow ordinary citizens to spend or save or invest more of their own money. Often cutting a tax rate will result in a net increase of [[tax revenue]]. The best example is the tax on [[capital gains]]. This phenomenon is described by the [[Laffer curve]], which states there exists a point when increasing taxes actually decreases tax revenue. | '''Tax cuts''' provide a stimulus to the economy, because they reduce the cost of doing business and allow ordinary citizens to spend or save or invest more of their own money. Often cutting a tax rate will result in a net increase of [[tax revenue]]. The best example is the tax on [[capital gains]]. This phenomenon is described by the [[Laffer curve]], which states there exists a point when increasing taxes actually decreases tax revenue. | ||
[[Category:Economics]] | [[Category:Economics]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Taxation]] |
Revision as of 16:20, January 18, 2009
Tax cuts provide a stimulus to the economy, because they reduce the cost of doing business and allow ordinary citizens to spend or save or invest more of their own money. Often cutting a tax rate will result in a net increase of tax revenue. The best example is the tax on capital gains. This phenomenon is described by the Laffer curve, which states there exists a point when increasing taxes actually decreases tax revenue.