User talk:CPalmer

Archive: 2008

Award

I am declaring you an honourary WikiGnome for all your efforts in doing the fiddly things no-one else seems to do. --KotomiT^{ohayougozaimasu} 12:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks! And congratulations to you on your well-deserved promotion - Conservapedia will benefit enormously from your extra powers.--CPalmer 13:23, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Thank you! Please yell if there is some way I can put these mysterious new powers to use helping you out. --KotomiT^{ohayougozaimasu} 13:28, 4 January 2009 (EST)

Great addition

That's a great addition to Essay:Best New Conservative Words!!!--Andy Schlafly 10:11, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks - I've been trying to think of a word that would be suitable, but not come up with anything good so far. I'll add it if I do...--CPalmer 10:24, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Liberal deceit

That's isn't a category, but a re-direct to deceit. The category for it, and the like is "Liberalism" which is added by the template "liberalism". --₮K_/Admin^/Talk 15:47, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Seems logical. Thanks--CPalmer 07:57, 13 January 2009 (EST)

query.

Just on your query "is there a way to list articles where the reflist is missing?" I am not 100% sure what you mean, but can I help? --KotomiT^nandeyanen? 09:36, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Just that in articles that have a <ref> tag but not a <references/> tag, you get a big red error message at the bottom of the page. I've come across a few of these by chance, but I was wondering whether there was a more systematic way to find and fix them (I also queried it at User Talk:EdBot).--CPalmer 09:41, 19 January 2009 (EST)

See the bottom of Talk:Barack Obama for an example of what I mean.--CPalmer 09:42, 19 January 2009 (EST)