Difference between revisions of "User talk:CPalmer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→query.) |
(→query.: no problem) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:::Ah, I see what you mean. To be honest I have no idea if there is an "easy" way to find them (like when I had to find all the unprotected pictures). Edbot might be your best bet. Sorry I can not help. :( --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 09:48, 19 January 2009 (EST) | :::Ah, I see what you mean. To be honest I have no idea if there is an "easy" way to find them (like when I had to find all the unprotected pictures). Edbot might be your best bet. Sorry I can not help. :( --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 09:48, 19 January 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::No problem Mike. For the benefit of anyone else reading this, I'm going to make an example at [[User:CPalmer/Missingrefs]].--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:49, 19 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:49, January 19, 2009
Archive: 2008
Award
I am declaring you an honourary WikiGnome for all your efforts in doing the fiddly things no-one else seems to do. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 12:51, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Thanks! And congratulations to you on your well-deserved promotion - Conservapedia will benefit enormously from your extra powers.--CPalmer 13:23, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Thank you! Please yell if there is some way I can put these mysterious new powers to use helping you out. --KotomiTohayougozaimasu 13:28, 4 January 2009 (EST)
Great addition
That's a great addition to Essay:Best New Conservative Words!!!--Andy Schlafly 10:11, 12 January 2009 (EST)
- Thanks - I've been trying to think of a word that would be suitable, but not come up with anything good so far. I'll add it if I do...--CPalmer 10:24, 12 January 2009 (EST)
Liberal deceit
That's isn't a category, but a re-direct to deceit. The category for it, and the like is "Liberalism" which is added by the template "liberalism". --₮K/Admin/Talk 15:47, 12 January 2009 (EST)
- Seems logical. Thanks--CPalmer 07:57, 13 January 2009 (EST)
query.
Just on your query "is there a way to list articles where the reflist is missing?" I am not 100% sure what you mean, but can I help? --KotomiTnandeyanen? 09:36, 19 January 2009 (EST)
- Just that in articles that have a <ref> tag but not a <references/> tag, you get a big red error message at the bottom of the page. I've come across a few of these by chance, but I was wondering whether there was a more systematic way to find and fix them (I also queried it at User Talk:EdBot).--CPalmer 09:41, 19 January 2009 (EST)
- See the bottom of Talk:Barack Obama for an example of what I mean.--CPalmer 09:42, 19 January 2009 (EST)
- (NMHOB) I misread you and fixed that one, then re-read and realised what you meant.... sorry. MikeSalter 09:45, 19 January 2009 (EST)
- Ah, I see what you mean. To be honest I have no idea if there is an "easy" way to find them (like when I had to find all the unprotected pictures). Edbot might be your best bet. Sorry I can not help. :( --KotomiTnandeyanen? 09:48, 19 January 2009 (EST)
- No problem Mike. For the benefit of anyone else reading this, I'm going to make an example at User:CPalmer/Missingrefs.--CPalmer 09:49, 19 January 2009 (EST)