Difference between revisions of "Debate:Is the theory of macroevolution true?"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
7. There is vast beauty in the world, such as brilliant autumn foliage, which would not exist in a purely evolutionary world. | 7. There is vast beauty in the world, such as brilliant autumn foliage, which would not exist in a purely evolutionary world. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 8. Abiogenisis is impossible. Even the simplest life form possible would be way too complicated to spring from nothing. | ||
Revision as of 15:58, December 17, 2006
Post Your Thoughts
yes...
no...
1. No credible transitional forms (fossils reflecting evolution between species) have ever been found.
2. There is no plausible explanation for the evolution of the whale, which is a mammal. Darwin suggested that the whale somehow came from black bears swimming with their mouths open!
3. Evolution cannot be reconciled with the evidence of a massive flood.
4. All mutations are harmful.
5. Species have being going extinct rather than being generated.
6. All unaided things become more disordered and scattered over time.
7. There is vast beauty in the world, such as brilliant autumn foliage, which would not exist in a purely evolutionary world.
8. Abiogenisis is impossible. Even the simplest life form possible would be way too complicated to spring from nothing.