Difference between revisions of "Talk:Discordianism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
...seriously, I know the tone is flippant, but do keep the subject matter in mind! It's meant to be a little lighthearted. (Also, if anyone knows of a better category to put this in than "Religion," it might go over better!) Also - I know I'm new at this. If I messed up the format and someone catches it, could you please drop me a line to let me know what I did wrong? Thanks! [[User:Pisha|Pisha]] 18:18, 6 July 2007 (EDT) | ...seriously, I know the tone is flippant, but do keep the subject matter in mind! It's meant to be a little lighthearted. (Also, if anyone knows of a better category to put this in than "Religion," it might go over better!) Also - I know I'm new at this. If I messed up the format and someone catches it, could you please drop me a line to let me know what I did wrong? Thanks! [[User:Pisha|Pisha]] 18:18, 6 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :This is supposed to be an encyclopedia-like resource. It's in fact ''not'' meant to be lighthearted ever regardless of subject matter--tone on Conservapedia should always be formal and informative. This article is the antithesis to Conservapedia's mission. -[[User:Ilikecake|Ilikecake]] 21:35, 28 January 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:35, January 29, 2009
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | 
|
I was quite nervous to edit the words of the Blessed St. Gulik himself... but then I remembered, hey, I'm a Pope! I've got every right to add some extra information!
...seriously, I know the tone is flippant, but do keep the subject matter in mind! It's meant to be a little lighthearted. (Also, if anyone knows of a better category to put this in than "Religion," it might go over better!) Also - I know I'm new at this. If I messed up the format and someone catches it, could you please drop me a line to let me know what I did wrong? Thanks! Pisha 18:18, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
- This is supposed to be an encyclopedia-like resource. It's in fact not meant to be lighthearted ever regardless of subject matter--tone on Conservapedia should always be formal and informative. This article is the antithesis to Conservapedia's mission. -Ilikecake 21:35, 28 January 2009 (EST)