Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paganism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I've removed the 'evil' part, which was an overstep, and also the Wicca plug in the main paragraph. It is still discussed in its proper place further down. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:30, 26 June 2007 (EDT) | :I've removed the 'evil' part, which was an overstep, and also the Wicca plug in the main paragraph. It is still discussed in its proper place further down. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:30, 26 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ok i replaced asatru with celtic reconstructionism because they are just more common although they dont seem to do a very good job of reconstructing anything | ||
Revision as of 10:26, February 1, 2009
| ! | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Religion-related articles on Conservapedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | 
|
I'm fairly certain the Rosicrucians consider themselves Christians. --BobD 00:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
Paganism is in no way any more evil than any other religion, and unless good evidence to the contrary is cited I will remove this mildly offensive accusation from this article. --Eyupdutch 11:26, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
- I've removed the 'evil' part, which was an overstep, and also the Wicca plug in the main paragraph. It is still discussed in its proper place further down. Learn together 11:30, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
ok i replaced asatru with celtic reconstructionism because they are just more common although they dont seem to do a very good job of reconstructing anything