Difference between revisions of "Debate:How is wikipedia anti-American?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
NotALiberal (talk | contribs) (Proposing for deletion) |
m (Reverted edits by NotALiberal (Talk) to last version by WesleyS) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
Ok this is the one thing that I never understood. Wikipedia was meant to have a "world-wide view" on a subject because if you filter your view and only look at it from an American perspective you can't really have a full grasp on a subject. Also just because you said something negative in the USA article doesn't mean it's blatantly "anti-american" I mean lets face it I doubt you can say anything positive about the slave trade or the Japaneses internment camps. --[[User:CartoonDiablo|CartoonDiablo]] 09:42, 15 June 2008 (EDT) | Ok this is the one thing that I never understood. Wikipedia was meant to have a "world-wide view" on a subject because if you filter your view and only look at it from an American perspective you can't really have a full grasp on a subject. Also just because you said something negative in the USA article doesn't mean it's blatantly "anti-american" I mean lets face it I doubt you can say anything positive about the slave trade or the Japaneses internment camps. --[[User:CartoonDiablo|CartoonDiablo]] 09:42, 15 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]] | [[Category:Conservapedia Debates]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:54, February 3, 2009
Ok this is the one thing that I never understood. Wikipedia was meant to have a "world-wide view" on a subject because if you filter your view and only look at it from an American perspective you can't really have a full grasp on a subject. Also just because you said something negative in the USA article doesn't mean it's blatantly "anti-american" I mean lets face it I doubt you can say anything positive about the slave trade or the Japaneses internment camps. --CartoonDiablo 09:42, 15 June 2008 (EDT)