Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arnold Schwarzenegger"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==Lacking content?==
 
==Lacking content?==
 
This article is amazingly lacking in content of Schwarzenggers acting career, and of his body building time before that. [[User:Jennisuk2|Jennisuk2]] 18:30, 28 January 2008 (EST)
 
This article is amazingly lacking in content of Schwarzenggers acting career, and of his body building time before that. [[User:Jennisuk2|Jennisuk2]] 18:30, 28 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Criticism==
 +
Aren't Criticisms supposed to be groups of people saying why they don't like something? The current criticism article is more like a ... political policies section. --[[User:Misken|Misken]] 14:42, 15 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 19:42, February 15, 2009

Unsupported opinion

This paragraph is tendentious and is completely unsupported by references. It should be replaced by a factual description of his positions, with source citations. (What is the basis for calling Schwarzenegger a radical environmentalist? Does he pound spikes into tree slated for lumbering? Who, exactly, refers to him as a "RINO")? The claim that these positions are Socialist is dubious, too. Dpbsmith 18:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Despite Schwarzenegger's claims of being a capitalist, he is a supporter of various socialist policies. He is a supporter of gun control, radical environmentalism, tax increases, and socialized medicine. In fact he is a staunch supporter of a bill that mandates the use of Californian taxpayer money to fund the cloning and killing of human embryos for experimentation. Because these and other policies he is often referred to as a "RINO," a "Republican in Name Only."


Lacking content?

This article is amazingly lacking in content of Schwarzenggers acting career, and of his body building time before that. Jennisuk2 18:30, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Criticism

Aren't Criticisms supposed to be groups of people saying why they don't like something? The current criticism article is more like a ... political policies section. --Misken 14:42, 15 February 2009 (EST)