Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:     
==Defense==
 
==Defense==
−
Defenders of methodological naturalism point out that it in no way requires or implies [[naturalism|philosophical naturalism]]. Many scientists of faith nevertheless adopt naturalism in their studies. This is because there is simply no way for an experiment to investigate forces which by their nature cannot be investigated scientifically.{{circular}}
+
Defenders of methodological naturalism point out that it in no way requires or implies [[naturalism|philosophical naturalism]]. Many scientists of faith nevertheless adopt naturalism in their studies.
−
 
  −
And the assumption that a supernatural force is not going to affect the outcome of an experiment is no more unreasonable than the assumption that supernatural forces are not going to miraculously poison all the apples in the supermarket.<ref>http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA301.html</ref>
      
== External Links ==
 
== External Links ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,723

edits

Navigation menu