Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(category add)
(→‎Category: +link!)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==Category==
 
==Category==
 
Please add to [[:Category:Linguistics]].  Thanks!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 11:25, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 
Please add to [[:Category:Linguistics]].  Thanks!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 11:25, 25 February 2009 (EST)
 +
:Also, please link to [[linguistics]]. It's strange the targets liberals fixate on... -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 11:38, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 16:38, February 25, 2009

Page Locked

I have protected this article for the time being, as it has recently been the target of parodists. If you have any changes that need to be made, please bring them up here and we can add them in. Hopefully, once the article is complete we can remove the protection. --KotomiTnandeyanen? 05:12, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Implications

The idea that language shapes thought is surely related to the idea that information affects decisions. If your knowledge of something is restricted to what your parents or school or government tells you, then you might not be aware of important aspects of that thing. This is why free speech vs. censorship continues to be an important issue. --Ed Poor Talk 10:06, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Category

Please add to Category:Linguistics. Thanks! WesleySHello! 11:25, 25 February 2009 (EST)

Also, please link to linguistics. It's strange the targets liberals fixate on... -Foxtrot 11:38, 25 February 2009 (EST)