Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loch Ness Monster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tmtoulouse (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Article needs total re-work== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that their really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:01, March 24, 2007
This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey
It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax.[Citation Needed] Conservative 12:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --Crackertalk 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Article needs total re-work
This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that their really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. Tmtoulouse 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT)