Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loch Ness Monster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tmtoulouse (talk | contribs) |
NeverForget (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Article needs total re-work== | ==Article needs total re-work== | ||
| − | This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that | + | This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:02, March 24, 2007
This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey
It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax.[Citation Needed] Conservative 12:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --Crackertalk 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
Article needs total re-work
This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. Tmtoulouse 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT)