Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adult stem cells"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(embryonic stem cells have been led to more medical discoveries than adult stem cells? Hard to believe)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
I have edited this for encyclopedic tone.  Yours, Andy, struck a definite POV, which I did not think was the goal here.  Is there an "abortion lobby" that you can point to, for me?  I would appreciate it if such uncited statements did not appear so often.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:52, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
 
  
−
:Andy please defend your perspective here.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:54, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
 
  
−
Submitted to panel. Please do not change, pending a ruling.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:56, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
+
This article needs a category, but editing is locked.  Might I suggest Category:Biology to one who can edit? [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 14:55, 19 November 2008 (EST)
−
 
 
−
:Your quote does not support your statement, either.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 22:57, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Andy, your silence speaks volumes.  Also, it's comforting to see that I am not the only one offended by your masquerading editorializing as facts.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 11:06, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
  
−
This article needs a category, but editing is locked.  Might I suggest Category:Biology to one who can edit? [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|<sup>Hello!</sup>]] 14:55, 19 November 2008 (EST)
+
:Article makes it seem like embryonic stem cells have been led to more medical discoveries than adult stem cells. This is precisely opposite to what I've been led to believe. Can someone help me source this?

Revision as of 12:33, March 15, 2009


This article needs a category, but editing is locked. Might I suggest Category:Biology to one who can edit? WesleySHello! 14:55, 19 November 2008 (EST)

Article makes it seem like embryonic stem cells have been led to more medical discoveries than adult stem cells. This is precisely opposite to what I've been led to believe. Can someone help me source this?
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Adult_stem_cells&oldid=639820"