Talk:Atheism and beliefs

I'm not touching this, though I do think panspermia needs to be added under Origins of Life. Jeffrey W. Lauttamus_Discussion 16:30, 7 January 2009 (EST)

That's a rarely held view (I think), but it may merit inclusion if common. - Rod Weathers 16:52, 7 January 2009 (EST)

So is limited speech, but panspermia is still a view held by some atheists. Jeffrey W. Lauttamus_Discussion 16:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought weak atheists denied they had a belief system and strong atheists acknowledge they hold beliefs. I don't want to change anything without being sure. Can anyone clarify?MBBurke 17:36, 7 January 2009 (EST)

This article reads like a smear campaign. Surely that is not what we want to teach our children? Jjameson 20:14, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

I don't see anything wrong with this article, it contains factual statements with supporting citations. This sort of thing should definatly be taught in order to broader expose what our children are exposed to, instead of the current narrow bias liberal views in todays modern media. GFasten 20:19, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

I apologize if you thought I meant that the failures of atheism should not be taught; however, some of these comments paint all atheists as Socialist, demonic freedom-haters, which surely we all know is somewhat hyperbolic. Surely sticking only to the facts about all atheists should be sufficiently convincing, or some rewording is necessary to show that not EVERY atheist described by all of these? Jjameson 20:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)

In addition, for "Moral Superiority", a blog is referenced. Perhaps a study or poll should be used to support this more powerfully? Jjameson 20:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)