Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Copyrights"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | In the absence of a policy, I would like to point out the following. | ||
| + | 1: Everything one writes is automatically under copyright. The original author has full rights. That's just how copyright law works. | ||
| + | 2: Since there is no copyright policy here, and no mention anywhere of any license agreement, full copyright stays with the original author, and there is no license conveyed to conservapedia. | ||
| + | 3: '''This may be a problem.''' As it stands, conservapedia has no rights to anything posted here. Depending on what future plans may be, this could become a big issue in the future. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | My point here is just to make it clear: without a copyright policy or license agreement, conservapedia has no explicit legal right to anything posted. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:06, April 1, 2009
In the absence of a policy, I would like to point out the following.
1: Everything one writes is automatically under copyright. The original author has full rights. That's just how copyright law works. 2: Since there is no copyright policy here, and no mention anywhere of any license agreement, full copyright stays with the original author, and there is no license conveyed to conservapedia. 3: This may be a problem. As it stands, conservapedia has no rights to anything posted here. Depending on what future plans may be, this could become a big issue in the future.
My point here is just to make it clear: without a copyright policy or license agreement, conservapedia has no explicit legal right to anything posted.