Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and deception"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Intellectual (Talk) to last version by DenningMR)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
:::I suggest you read the article several times until the obvious becomes more obvious to you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:06, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::I suggest you read the article several times until the obvious becomes more obvious to you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:06, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::Because reading it is all you can do.  You sure ain't going to be editing it.  --[[User:DenningMR|DenningMR]] 21:08, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::Because reading it is all you can do.  You sure ain't going to be editing it.  --[[User:DenningMR|DenningMR]] 21:08, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
−
:::::Lol. Yeah, make a valid argument, you get banned. [[User:Intellectual|Intellectual]] 13:12, 13 May 2009 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 17:12, May 13, 2009

"Evolutionary Position Gradually Losing Public Support"

What does this have to do with the argument that evolutionists are deceitful? Moreover, what does public support have to do with the truth value of any idea? How many Americans believe that Elvis is still alive? Or in UFOs? Or Bigfoot? Or that Obama is a Muslim? Are any of these ideas more or less valid because of what the American people think about them? AliceBG 19:54, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

I suggest you read the article several times until the obvious becomes more obvious to you. Conservative 21:06, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
Because reading it is all you can do. You sure ain't going to be editing it. --DenningMR 21:08, 30 June 2008 (EDT)