Difference between revisions of "Essay:Conservapedia's Law"
(implications section: politics, and also Wikipedia) |
(Revised moores law) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
For example, there is an approximate doubling in effective [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|new conservative terms]] per century. | For example, there is an approximate doubling in effective [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|new conservative terms]] per century. | ||
| − | '''Conservapedia's Law''' is analogous to [[Moore's Law]], which holds that | + | '''Conservapedia's Law''' is analogous to [[Moore's Law]], which holds that the number of transistors that can economically be incorporated in an integrated circuit roughly doubles every two years. |
== Implications == | == Implications == | ||
Revision as of 00:32, June 10, 2009
Conservapedia's Law is the observation that conservative insights increase over time at a geometric rate, as in 1-2-4-8-16-etc.
For example, there is an approximate doubling in effective new conservative terms per century.
Conservapedia's Law is analogous to Moore's Law, which holds that the number of transistors that can economically be incorporated in an integrated circuit roughly doubles every two years.
Implications
The implications of Conservapedia's Law are striking. Over the long term, politics and culture cannot withstand the more powerful forces of logic and language. Conservapedia's Law ensures that a free society will, over time, inevitably become more conservative regardless of the best efforts of liberals. Of course liberal deceit can cause much suffering during that process.
Another implication is that Wikipedia, in order to survive, will inevitably feel compelled to adopt principles similar to Conservapedia's. The liberal practices and rules underlying Wikipedia will either be abandoned or lead it to inevitable ruin.