Difference between revisions of "Golan v. Gonzales"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'In ''Golan v. Gonzales'', 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit repeated the "the bedrock principle of copyright law that works in the public domain [must] remain the...') |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Golan v. Gonzales'', 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit | + | In ''Golan v. Gonzales'', 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit confirmed "the bedrock principle of copyright law that works in the public domain [must] remain there," and not even Congress or an international treaty can remove them from the public domain. ''Id.'' at 1187. |
[[category:copyright]] | [[category:copyright]] | ||
[[category:Circuit Cases]] | [[category:Circuit Cases]] | ||
[[Category:Tenth Circuit]] | [[Category:Tenth Circuit]] | ||
Revision as of 21:59, June 14, 2009
In Golan v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit confirmed "the bedrock principle of copyright law that works in the public domain [must] remain there," and not even Congress or an international treaty can remove them from the public domain. Id. at 1187.