Difference between revisions of "Golan v. Gonzales"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m (wikify) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Golan v. Gonzales'', 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit confirmed "the bedrock principle of copyright law that works in the public domain [must] remain there," and not even Congress or an international treaty can remove them from the public domain. ''Id.'' at 1187. | + | In ''Golan v. Gonzales'', 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit confirmed "the bedrock principle of [[copyright]] law that works in the [[public domain]] [must] remain there," and not even [[Congress]] or an international [[treaty]] can remove them from the public domain. ''Id.'' at 1187. |
[[category:copyright]] | [[category:copyright]] | ||
[[category:Circuit Cases]] | [[category:Circuit Cases]] | ||
[[Category:Tenth Circuit]] | [[Category:Tenth Circuit]] | ||
Revision as of 23:37, June 17, 2009
In Golan v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007), the Tenth Circuit confirmed "the bedrock principle of copyright law that works in the public domain [must] remain there," and not even Congress or an international treaty can remove them from the public domain. Id. at 1187.