Difference between revisions of "Carl Baugh"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(image) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Carl Baugh''' is a [[Young Earth Creationist]]. Baugh received his doctorates from [[Pacific International University]] and [[Louisiana Baptist University]] (both of which are unaccredited institutions). He is known as a forceful speaker who has helped many come to [[Jesus Christ]]. Some of Baugh's arguments are controversial with his fellow creationists. [[Answers in Genesis]] considers Baugh's reports of finding human footprints next to dinosaur prints to be discredited and lists it as an argument that creationists should not use. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp</ref> | + | [[File:CreationEvidenceMuseum.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Baugh's original Creation Evidence Museum]] |
| + | '''Carl Baugh''' is a [[Young Earth Creationist]]. Baugh received his doctorates from [[Pacific International University]] and [[Louisiana Baptist University]] (both of which are unaccredited institutions). He is known as a forceful speaker who has helped many come to [[Jesus Christ]]. Some of Baugh's arguments are controversial not only with mainstream scientists but with his fellow creationists. [[Answers in Genesis]] considers Baugh's reports of finding human footprints next to dinosaur prints to be discredited and lists it as an argument that creationists should not use. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:31, June 27, 2009
Carl Baugh is a Young Earth Creationist. Baugh received his doctorates from Pacific International University and Louisiana Baptist University (both of which are unaccredited institutions). He is known as a forceful speaker who has helped many come to Jesus Christ. Some of Baugh's arguments are controversial not only with mainstream scientists but with his fellow creationists. Answers in Genesis considers Baugh's reports of finding human footprints next to dinosaur prints to be discredited and lists it as an argument that creationists should not use. [1]