Difference between revisions of "Talk:Seventh-day Adventist Church"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fixed) |
Daniel1212 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What is (was) this infomercial doing in CP? Not a word about the controversy regarding whether it even qualifies to be called Christian according to the Biblical and historical use of the word.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 13:04, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | What is (was) this infomercial doing in CP? Not a word about the controversy regarding whether it even qualifies to be called Christian according to the Biblical and historical use of the word.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 13:04, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
::there was too much on the Evangelical opposition to SDA--which can be briefly summarized--and not enough on the church itself, so I ficed that. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 14:45, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ::there was too much on the Evangelical opposition to SDA--which can be briefly summarized--and not enough on the church itself, so I ficed that. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 14:45, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::What you did was to minimized the substantial conflict that SDA had and has with historical Christianity, as well as to sanitize the negative things which it revolve around, while favorably presenting your doctrine. Your censoring would not even be allowed on WP.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 17:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:44, July 10, 2009
Infomercial
What is (was) this infomercial doing in CP? Not a word about the controversy regarding whether it even qualifies to be called Christian according to the Biblical and historical use of the word.Daniel1212 13:04, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
- there was too much on the Evangelical opposition to SDA--which can be briefly summarized--and not enough on the church itself, so I ficed that. RJJensen 14:45, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
- What you did was to minimized the substantial conflict that SDA had and has with historical Christianity, as well as to sanitize the negative things which it revolve around, while favorably presenting your doctrine. Your censoring would not even be allowed on WP.Daniel1212 17:44, 10 July 2009 (EDT)