Difference between revisions of "Talk:P-adic values"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's my feeling that this should be merged with [[P-adic values]]. We don't need two articles on the p-adic system, do we? If I get an agreement here, I'll perform the merger myself if you like.[[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 10:31, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | It's my feeling that this should be merged with [[P-adic values]]. We don't need two articles on the p-adic system, do we? If I get an agreement here, I'll perform the merger myself if you like.[[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 10:31, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
:On second thought, I can't imagine that this would be controversial, so I'm going to go ahead, perform the move, and nominate this page for deletion. We can always undo it if somebody disagrees. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 10:49, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | :On second thought, I can't imagine that this would be controversial, so I'm going to go ahead, perform the move, and nominate this page for deletion. We can always undo it if somebody disagrees. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 10:49, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::See your talk page about this unauthorized action. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 18:58, 14 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:58, July 14, 2009
It's my feeling that this should be merged with P-adic values. We don't need two articles on the p-adic system, do we? If I get an agreement here, I'll perform the merger myself if you like.JacobB 10:31, 14 July 2009 (EDT)
- On second thought, I can't imagine that this would be controversial, so I'm going to go ahead, perform the move, and nominate this page for deletion. We can always undo it if somebody disagrees. JacobB 10:49, 14 July 2009 (EDT)