Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Nb sl english premier"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Update: new section)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
==Requires updating==
 
==Requires updating==
 
to allow for this year's relegations and promotions. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:43, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
 
to allow for this year's relegations and promotions. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:43, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Update ==
 +
 +
Hi,
 +
 +
Could someone with permission to edit this page please remove [[Middlesbrough F.C.]], [[Newcastle United F.C.]] and [[West Bromwich Albion F.C.]], and replace them with [[Birmingham City F.C.|Birmingham]], [[Burnley F.C.|Burnley]] & [[Wolverhampton Wanderers F.C.|Wolves]], to represent this seasons promotions and relegations so the template shows the 2009-10 Premier League?
 +
 +
I'll write the three promoted articles when I have time.
 +
 +
Thanks, --[[User:Ozoo|Ozoo]] 15:58, 15 July 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:58, July 15, 2009

I wish the red links wouldn't show up as "wanted" multiple times in "wanted pages". Just once would be fine.

So how about hiding the template contents until some UK football enthusiast fill in the remaining red links? --Ed Poor Talk 13:45, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

OK, so you hide the nav box so that nobody knows which teams need an article! BrianCo 17:49, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

Requires updating

to allow for this year's relegations and promotions. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 15:43, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

Update

Hi,

Could someone with permission to edit this page please remove Middlesbrough F.C., Newcastle United F.C. and West Bromwich Albion F.C., and replace them with Birmingham, Burnley & Wolves, to represent this seasons promotions and relegations so the template shows the 2009-10 Premier League?

I'll write the three promoted articles when I have time.

Thanks, --Ozoo 15:58, 15 July 2009 (EDT)