Difference between revisions of "User talk:PhyllisS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(new section: "Conjugate base / acid")
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
Just a suggestion from a non-physics major. Thank you. --[[User:ChrisZ|ɹǝlƃǝız ɹǝdoʇsıɹɥɔ]] 21:54, 2 August 2009 (EDT)
 
Just a suggestion from a non-physics major. Thank you. --[[User:ChrisZ|ɹǝlƃǝız ɹǝdoʇsıɹɥɔ]] 21:54, 2 August 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
Sorry about that; I'll continue to work on them today to make them more clear. I thought the original definition was a little misleading. Firstly, the original didn't make clear that conjugate acid/bases occur in pairs, i.e. it sounded like NH_4+ is a conjugate acid in of itself, when really it is a conjugate acid OF NH_3. Secondly, the article was wrong - it referred to NH_4+ as a conjugate base, when it is obviously a conjugate acid.
 +
 +
Thanks so much for the feedback! I'll work on it right now. [[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]] 10:31, 3 August 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:31, August 3, 2009

I moved enjambment down to a subpage of talk:enjambment. Can you clarify the example? --Ed Poor Talk 16:14, 6 May 2009 (EDT)

  • Thanks, but you have to stop. I've found serious errors in 2 out of 2 articles you started, which I checked. --Ed Poor Talk 16:28, 6 May 2009 (EDT)

Hurray for Princeton

Princeton certainly made the right choice. If you're planning on a physics major look up Liz Jensen. She was an undergrad physics major (at Smith) and is now a grad student at Princeton in aerospace engineering.RJJensen 19:04, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

Hey Phyllis! So this is you?? And congrats on Princeton! AddisonDM 19:31, 9 May 2009 (EDT)

Promotion

Great job our newest administrator! --Jpatt 22:40, 28 July 2009 (EDT)

Aww, thanks so much! I am very excited. :-) PhyllisS 22:45, 28 July 2009 (EDT)
Thank the Lord, I have spell checker built into Firefox! Congrats :D --ṬK/Admin/Talk 23:27, 28 July 2009 (EDT)

Sharp spell checker

Yes, thank God for FF, and PhyllisS who picked out Mosiac from Mosaic (as in law)!Daniel1212 16:58, 31 July 2009 (EDT)

Conjugate base / acid

Can you explain why you completely changed both Conjugate base and Conjugate acid? I was able to understand them almost completely, but now, I can't understand a lick.

I can see that you want to provide a sort of "mastery" knowledge to each article, but "HX" terms really throw me off--as it would to any person new to the topics. Maybe you combine the content of the previous article with your knowledge instead of transforming it into something new.

Just a suggestion from a non-physics major. Thank you. --ɹǝlƃǝız ɹǝdoʇsıɹɥɔ 21:54, 2 August 2009 (EDT)

Sorry about that; I'll continue to work on them today to make them more clear. I thought the original definition was a little misleading. Firstly, the original didn't make clear that conjugate acid/bases occur in pairs, i.e. it sounded like NH_4+ is a conjugate acid in of itself, when really it is a conjugate acid OF NH_3. Secondly, the article was wrong - it referred to NH_4+ as a conjugate base, when it is obviously a conjugate acid.

Thanks so much for the feedback! I'll work on it right now. PhyllisS 10:31, 3 August 2009 (EDT)