Difference between revisions of "Liberal politicians and uncharitableness"
Conservative (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Concerning the subject of '''liberal politicians and uncharitableness''', the political magazine the ''American Spectator'' declared: {{cquote|The last two Democratic Party n...') |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 23:30, August 22, 2009
Concerning the subject of liberal politicians and uncharitableness, the political magazine the American Spectator declared:
| “ | The last two Democratic Party nominees for President have come up short on the charity scale. Al Gore has been famously stingy when it comes to actually giving his own money to charities. In 1998 he was embarrassed when his tax returns revealed that he gave just $353 to charity...
Senator John Kerry likewise has a poor record. In 1995 he gave zero to charity, but did spend $500,000 to buy a half stake in a seventeenth century painting. In 1993, he gave $175 to the needy. Later, of course, Kerry married the rich widow Theresa Heinz, and today is active in charitable causes using the Heinz foundation as his vehicle... [Senator Ted] Kennedy’s tax returns are obviously a closely guarded secret. But when he chose to run for President in the 1970s, he released some of them. With a net worth of more than $8 million in the early 1970s and an income of $461,444 from a series of family trusts, Senator Robin Hood gave barely 1 percent of his income to charity. The sum is about as much as Kennedy claimed as a write-off on his fifty-foot sailing sloop Curragh.[1] |
” |