Difference between revisions of "Talk:Antonin Scalia"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Responsive interpretations)
 
(explanation of repeated rollback of AmesG's edit, and locking page)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Andy, I'm right.  The "Living Constitution" idea is the "responsive" modality of interpretation, typified by Brown.  How is that wrong?  Unless you disagree with Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:19, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Andy, I'm right.  The "Living Constitution" idea is the "responsive" modality of interpretation, typified by Brown.  How is that wrong?  Unless you disagree with Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:19, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
AmesG repeatedly inserted a reference to Brown v. Board of Ed. in an attempt to justify the liberal "evolving Constitution."
 +
 +
Brown v. Board of Ed. overturned the Supreme Court's own ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson.  The citation is simply inappropriate here.
 +
 +
This page has to be locked to prevent recurrence of this edit, and vandalism, because this page is now linked on the main page for the 28th.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:20, 28 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:20, March 28, 2007

Andy, I'm right. The "Living Constitution" idea is the "responsive" modality of interpretation, typified by Brown. How is that wrong? Unless you disagree with Brown.-AmesGyo! 01:19, 28 March 2007 (EDT)


AmesG repeatedly inserted a reference to Brown v. Board of Ed. in an attempt to justify the liberal "evolving Constitution."

Brown v. Board of Ed. overturned the Supreme Court's own ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson. The citation is simply inappropriate here.

This page has to be locked to prevent recurrence of this edit, and vandalism, because this page is now linked on the main page for the 28th.--Aschlafly 01:20, 28 March 2007 (EDT)