Difference between revisions of "User talk:ChuckR"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(good ideas) |
JLauttamus (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
::you have some good ideas on Kennedy worth discussing. Keep themm posted. :) [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:50, 17 October 2009 (EDT) | ::you have some good ideas on Kennedy worth discussing. Keep themm posted. :) [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 19:50, 17 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::but whatever you do don't call editors "intellectually dishonest." Instead, so some more reading and thinking. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 23:12, 2 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==RINO== | ||
| + | Those two people you deleted are back-stabbers of conservatives and conservative principles. They stay on the list.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:18, 5 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a '''Republican''' in name only if they're not a Republican? -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 19:06, 5 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:06, November 6, 2009
RINO
Those two people you deleted are back-stabbers of conservatives and conservative principles. They stay on the list.--Jpatt 15:18, 5 November 2009 (EST)
- Very curious as to why my last update was reverted. How can one be a Republican in name only if they're not a Republican? -- Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 19:06, 5 November 2009 (EST)