Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paul Robeson"
(→This Article: Popycock) |
(→This Article: response) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Typical of liberals, resorting to insults and denigration whenever you disagree, and whenever communists or communism is presented realistically. We are not interested in softening our anti-communist/anti-Marxist POV, AmandaC. If you are interested in that kind of softening, that kind of evasion, try Wikipedia. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 04:16, 21 November 2009 (EST) | :Typical of liberals, resorting to insults and denigration whenever you disagree, and whenever communists or communism is presented realistically. We are not interested in softening our anti-communist/anti-Marxist POV, AmandaC. If you are interested in that kind of softening, that kind of evasion, try Wikipedia. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 04:16, 21 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Who ever said I was liberal, I am NOT A LIBERAL!??!! You can prove this man's obvious ties to Marxism and Stalinism without throwing in embarrassing weasel words and lies but that requires READING about him, not just making things up.My edits are CITED fact not fiction.Anyone with any education in history reading your edits would just laugh at them because they sound so personal. | ||
| + | -[[User:AmandaC|AmandaC]]21:23, 21 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:34, November 22, 2009
This Article
It is filled with too many povs. You can keep the conservative slant but should not leave out history. He was , afterall, pro-America and not a staunch radical Leftist until he was well into his 30's. -AmandaC
- pro-American?? his main goal was to stop the civil rights movement cold by moving the blacks to the far left, away from the NAACP. RJJensen 01:23, 20 November 2009 (EST)
What? Do you know anything about Paul Robeson? He was huge patriotic prior to Marxism. One can could argue not afterwords but seriously the two of you only seem to know how to approach this subject vitriolically. It makes conservative people look very inept. -AmandaC11:23, 20 November 2009 (EST)
- Typical of liberals, resorting to insults and denigration whenever you disagree, and whenever communists or communism is presented realistically. We are not interested in softening our anti-communist/anti-Marxist POV, AmandaC. If you are interested in that kind of softening, that kind of evasion, try Wikipedia. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 04:16, 21 November 2009 (EST)
Who ever said I was liberal, I am NOT A LIBERAL!??!! You can prove this man's obvious ties to Marxism and Stalinism without throwing in embarrassing weasel words and lies but that requires READING about him, not just making things up.My edits are CITED fact not fiction.Anyone with any education in history reading your edits would just laugh at them because they sound so personal. -AmandaC21:23, 21 November 2009 (EST)