Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fegeism"
(Proposed deletion of all "MemeShock"-related pages) |
(We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but this unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Now that the "MemeShock language" has been removed from [[Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]], I'd like to suggest that this page and any others be removed as well. The methodology of this program has been rejected by Aschlafly and others, given CP's advocacy of open-mindedness and free speech to settle ideological disputes, rather than deception. Jfraatz's title "Engineered Language using a Linguistic Deep Structure Algorithm" appears to be utter gibberish (pending his response; see the relevant section of [[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]]); given this I suspect that he is either a parodist, dishonest, or a pseudo-intellectual doofus of the highest order. In none of these cases is there any reason for CP to continue to be a part of this "social experiment". Perhaps Mr. Raatz could first outline his proposals in the Essay: space. --[[User:JimR|JimR]] 22:18, 1 December 2009 (EST) | Now that the "MemeShock language" has been removed from [[Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]], I'd like to suggest that this page and any others be removed as well. The methodology of this program has been rejected by Aschlafly and others, given CP's advocacy of open-mindedness and free speech to settle ideological disputes, rather than deception. Jfraatz's title "Engineered Language using a Linguistic Deep Structure Algorithm" appears to be utter gibberish (pending his response; see the relevant section of [[Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words]]); given this I suspect that he is either a parodist, dishonest, or a pseudo-intellectual doofus of the highest order. In none of these cases is there any reason for CP to continue to be a part of this "social experiment". Perhaps Mr. Raatz could first outline his proposals in the Essay: space. --[[User:JimR|JimR]] 22:18, 1 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I agree. We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but the above-described unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:50, 1 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 03:50, December 2, 2009
Deletion
Now that the "MemeShock language" has been removed from Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words, I'd like to suggest that this page and any others be removed as well. The methodology of this program has been rejected by Aschlafly and others, given CP's advocacy of open-mindedness and free speech to settle ideological disputes, rather than deception. Jfraatz's title "Engineered Language using a Linguistic Deep Structure Algorithm" appears to be utter gibberish (pending his response; see the relevant section of Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words); given this I suspect that he is either a parodist, dishonest, or a pseudo-intellectual doofus of the highest order. In none of these cases is there any reason for CP to continue to be a part of this "social experiment". Perhaps Mr. Raatz could first outline his proposals in the Essay: space. --JimR 22:18, 1 December 2009 (EST)
- I agree. We are open-minded and reluctant to quash any intellectual activity, but the above-described unthinking silliness looks like it should be the exception that proves the rule.--Andy Schlafly 22:50, 1 December 2009 (EST)