Difference between revisions of "Whig Interpretation of History"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(new) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Category:Historians]] | [[Category:Historians]] | ||
| + | [[Category:History]] | ||
Revision as of 03:44, December 11, 2009
The Whig Interpretation of History is a concept in historiography that is too present-oriented when dealing with the past. It characterized many historians, such as Thomas Babington Macaulay (1800-1859). They saw British history as the inevitable unfolding of progress, especially liberty and parliamentary rule, with the inexorable defeat of Toryism and absolute monarchy. 20th century historians took a much more nuanced approach and dropped the notion of inevitable progress. They now warn against looking at the past as a simple pathway to the present, insisting there were always multiple contingencies along the way.
Further reading
- Butterfield, Herbert. The Whig interpretation of history (1931)online