Difference between revisions of "Talk:Destiny Church"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
There's some biased information here I've removed - many would disagree the church is well-led. Even many New Zealand evangelicals see Destiny Church as a 'cult', in part as a result of a perceived emphasis on Prosperity Gospel.[[User:UlyssesNZ|UlyssesNZ]] 20:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT) | There's some biased information here I've removed - many would disagree the church is well-led. Even many New Zealand evangelicals see Destiny Church as a 'cult', in part as a result of a perceived emphasis on Prosperity Gospel.[[User:UlyssesNZ|UlyssesNZ]] 20:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I don't think we should pay attention to anyone who calls our church a cult . --[[User:PThomson|PThomson]] 20:18, 14 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:18, December 15, 2009
reverted your changes because
It believes in the word of Lord as in the Bible, and although in a country surrounded by blasphemy, social decay and immorality, (New Zealand) serves to protect its standing as a Christian country.
Note that the subject "it" is in the sentence once and to repeat it is bad grammar.
years v year's
I'm not exactly sure why but I think years is better here. --
There's some biased information here I've removed - many would disagree the church is well-led. Even many New Zealand evangelicals see Destiny Church as a 'cult', in part as a result of a perceived emphasis on Prosperity Gospel.UlyssesNZ 20:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT)
- I don't think we should pay attention to anyone who calls our church a cult . --PThomson 20:18, 14 December 2009 (EST)