Difference between revisions of "Talk:Best of the public"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(A third "Invisible Hand?")
 
m
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Thus, best of the public would be a central force.  When applied to economic matters, it would result in Smith's invisible hand; when applied to social matters, it would result in the Invisible Hand of Marriage, and when applied to intellectual, it would result in the Invisible Hand of Insight.
 
Thus, best of the public would be a central force.  When applied to economic matters, it would result in Smith's invisible hand; when applied to social matters, it would result in the Invisible Hand of Marriage, and when applied to intellectual, it would result in the Invisible Hand of Insight.
  
−
In fact, best of the public provides a powerful means of explaining exactly why big government liberalism is so harmful.  Invariably, dependency on big government intervention interferes with the best of the public, and thus, with the ability of the Invisible Hands t act.
+
In fact, best of the public provides a powerful means of explaining exactly why big government liberalism is so harmful.  Invariably, dependency on big government intervention interferes with the best of the public, and thus, with the ability of the Invisible Hands to act.
  
 
Really, a remarkable piece of insight.  It succinctly and concisely identifies the engine behind conservatism.  Well done, indeed!
 
Really, a remarkable piece of insight.  It succinctly and concisely identifies the engine behind conservatism.  Well done, indeed!
  
 
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 22:18, 15 December 2009 (EST)
 
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 22:18, 15 December 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 03:23, December 16, 2009

A third "Invisible Hand?"

Andy,

I think you may be underestimating the importance of the concept you've articulated. It seems to be that best of the public, when applied to an academic endeavor, creates a third "Invisible Hand"--an "Invisible Hand of Insight," if you will, with the power to lead to deeper and more powerful insights than conventional, expert-dominated processes.

Indeed, it may well be that best of the public is, in fact, the driving mechanism behind all of the Invisible Hands. Certainly, Smith's Invisible Hand can only function in a free market, where the best of the public is free to produce goods and generate wealth. The Invisible Hand of Marriage only functions in a society where those who believe in the value of the family are free to marry and raise children to share those values--again, the best of the public coming to the fore.

Thus, best of the public would be a central force. When applied to economic matters, it would result in Smith's invisible hand; when applied to social matters, it would result in the Invisible Hand of Marriage, and when applied to intellectual, it would result in the Invisible Hand of Insight.

In fact, best of the public provides a powerful means of explaining exactly why big government liberalism is so harmful. Invariably, dependency on big government intervention interferes with the best of the public, and thus, with the ability of the Invisible Hands to act.

Really, a remarkable piece of insight. It succinctly and concisely identifies the engine behind conservatism. Well done, indeed!

--Benp 22:18, 15 December 2009 (EST)