Difference between revisions of "Evolution by natural selection"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(redo link)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]:
+
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]:
 
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design]
 
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]
 
[[Category:Evolution]]

Revision as of 18:59, December 28, 2009

Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental assumption on which it's based, is a legitimate part of science as well. Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design