Difference between revisions of "Talk:Virgin birth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It would have been nice if they could have looked at my properly-sourced edit, but it was removed immediately, and I was blocked by you, apparently for ideological reasons. What happened to being open to all points of view? --[[User:Teamonger|Teamonger]] 22:38, 18 February 2010 (EST) | It would have been nice if they could have looked at my properly-sourced edit, but it was removed immediately, and I was blocked by you, apparently for ideological reasons. What happened to being open to all points of view? --[[User:Teamonger|Teamonger]] 22:38, 18 February 2010 (EST) | ||
:It may have been a "properly-sourced" edit, as you claim, but is it the truth? What I saw was just a repeat of "did God ''really'' do that?", a philosophy taken up by the God-hating crowd since Eden. We don't have to be open to points of view which pushes that sort of thinking. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:42, 18 February 2010 (EST) | :It may have been a "properly-sourced" edit, as you claim, but is it the truth? What I saw was just a repeat of "did God ''really'' do that?", a philosophy taken up by the God-hating crowd since Eden. We don't have to be open to points of view which pushes that sort of thinking. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:42, 18 February 2010 (EST) | ||
| − | :: I | + | :: I don't know whether it's the truth or not, only the apostle Paul knew for sure what he meant by that passage. But it seems truth must be set in stone for you. Thus when the Conservpedia guidelines claim, "Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons", that appears to be just a joke. --[[User:Teamonger|Teamonger]] 00:21, 19 February 2010 (EST) |
Revision as of 05:21, February 19, 2010
To anybody who doubts the value of the Conservative Bible Project, just look at Teamonger's edit to this page. JacobB 20:36, 17 November 2009 (EST)
It would have been nice if they could have looked at my properly-sourced edit, but it was removed immediately, and I was blocked by you, apparently for ideological reasons. What happened to being open to all points of view? --Teamonger 22:38, 18 February 2010 (EST)
- It may have been a "properly-sourced" edit, as you claim, but is it the truth? What I saw was just a repeat of "did God really do that?", a philosophy taken up by the God-hating crowd since Eden. We don't have to be open to points of view which pushes that sort of thinking. Karajou 23:42, 18 February 2010 (EST)
- I don't know whether it's the truth or not, only the apostle Paul knew for sure what he meant by that passage. But it seems truth must be set in stone for you. Thus when the Conservpedia guidelines claim, "Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons", that appears to be just a joke. --Teamonger 00:21, 19 February 2010 (EST)