Difference between revisions of "User talk:Avoge"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:My apologies, I am unaware of what this rule is, can you please explain? [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 16:16, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
 
:My apologies, I am unaware of what this rule is, can you please explain? [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 16:16, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
 
::Most edits should be to mainspace articles. [[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 16:17, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
 
::Most edits should be to mainspace articles. [[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 16:17, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
 +
:::I will do my best, but I believe discussion should be had before any edits to mainspace articles. [[User:Avoge|A. Vogel]] 16:19, 24 March 2010 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:19, March 24, 2010

Up for Discussion

Please present your points here. A. Vogel 14:49, 3 November 2009 (EST) Thanks for the support on my ban. I thought that "so called" was a little snarky. Thomas Paine was influenced by the Enlightenment.

Thanks for the support, my feelings exactly.

A Warning

Avoge, looking at your history it seems that you are very close to violating the 90/10 rule. I will not block you now, but you should take care to make more substantial edits in the future. Wuhao1911 16:13, 24 March 2010 (EDT)

My apologies, I am unaware of what this rule is, can you please explain? A. Vogel 16:16, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
Most edits should be to mainspace articles. Wuhao1911 16:17, 24 March 2010 (EDT)
I will do my best, but I believe discussion should be had before any edits to mainspace articles. A. Vogel 16:19, 24 March 2010 (EDT)