Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quotations from Chairman Mao"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JLauttamus (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'm not sure I'm comfortable with having a detailed article on Chairman Mao's "Little Red Book" on Conservapedia. Certainly, if we're going to include it, I think we should include a description of the damage it's done. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:32, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | I'm not sure I'm comfortable with having a detailed article on Chairman Mao's "Little Red Book" on Conservapedia. Certainly, if we're going to include it, I think we should include a description of the damage it's done. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:32, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
*Then you are free to add it. [[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 18:32, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | *Then you are free to add it. [[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 18:32, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::The damage done by the book itself, or the damage done by Mao? A wikilink to [[Mao Zedong]] should do the trick, eh? -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeff W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 18:51, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:51, March 25, 2010
Is This Really Appropriate?
I'm not sure I'm comfortable with having a detailed article on Chairman Mao's "Little Red Book" on Conservapedia. Certainly, if we're going to include it, I think we should include a description of the damage it's done. --Benp 17:32, 25 March 2010 (EDT)
- Then you are free to add it. Wuhao1911 18:32, 25 March 2010 (EDT)
- The damage done by the book itself, or the damage done by Mao? A wikilink to Mao Zedong should do the trick, eh? -- Jeff W. LauttamusDiscussion 18:51, 25 March 2010 (EDT)