Difference between revisions of "Talk:Remarkable Jews"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(This entry violates the Conservapedia Commandments. For example, it is non-encyclopedic and non-educational.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Though I appreciate many of Joaquin's contributions to this site, I must recommend the deletion of this entry for the above reasons, while welcoming praise based on merit for any individuals listed here.  Comments are welcome before I delete this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:58, 28 March 2010 (EDT)
 
Though I appreciate many of Joaquin's contributions to this site, I must recommend the deletion of this entry for the above reasons, while welcoming praise based on merit for any individuals listed here.  Comments are welcome before I delete this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:58, 28 March 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Perhaps it should be a category rather than an article.[[User:HectorJ|HectorJ]] 21:05, 28 March 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:05, March 29, 2010

This entry violates the Conservapedia Commandments. For example, it is non-encyclopedic and non-educational. One might falsely infer that Jewish people not on the list are somehow not remarkable. This site moves beyond ethnicity but this entry seems headed in the opposite direction.

Though I appreciate many of Joaquin's contributions to this site, I must recommend the deletion of this entry for the above reasons, while welcoming praise based on merit for any individuals listed here. Comments are welcome before I delete this.--Andy Schlafly 20:58, 28 March 2010 (EDT)

Perhaps it should be a category rather than an article.HectorJ 21:05, 28 March 2010 (EDT)