Difference between revisions of "User talk:SamuelC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(thanks) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Thanks for reverting the vandalism, he's blocked now. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 15:37, 17 April 2010 (EDT) | :Thanks for reverting the vandalism, he's blocked now. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 15:37, 17 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
::You're both welcome. Now, I'm off to improve the wiki a bit. [[User:SamuelC|SamuelC]] 15:38, 17 April 2010 (EDT) | ::You're both welcome. Now, I'm off to improve the wiki a bit. [[User:SamuelC|SamuelC]] 15:38, 17 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Thanks == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for removing that spurious link. I was wondering how that got in there as you were removing it!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:53, 18 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:53, April 18, 2010
Is there a reason you're undoing all my edits? Pbafreincrqvnfhpxf 14:10, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
- The mass of vandalism, blanking, replacing words with genitals, and insulting Conservapedia? Yes. Yes, there is a reason why I'm undoing them. SamuelC 14:11, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
- Whatever. No one's blocked me yet. Pbafreincrqvnfhpxf 14:21, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
lolwut?
Good job
Good work with the vandals. You're a very patient person! DanielPulido 15:10, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks for reverting the vandalism, he's blocked now. Taj 15:37, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
- You're both welcome. Now, I'm off to improve the wiki a bit. SamuelC 15:38, 17 April 2010 (EDT)
Thanks
Thanks for removing that spurious link. I was wondering how that got in there as you were removing it!--Andy Schlafly 15:53, 18 April 2010 (EDT)