Changes

227 bytes added ,  17:01, March 31, 2007
Line 289: Line 289:  
:Third—your edit was in violation of this site’s rules, it made an untrue and unverifiable claim—if you can find one place where the ACLU actually claims that the Constitution has a “sodomy clause” I will gladly apologize, but until then, claims that they say the Constitution has such a clause do not belong on this site.  (If you really want to criticize the ACLU there is plenty to criticize them for without making false accusations and you should feel free to do that).--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 12:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Third—your edit was in violation of this site’s rules, it made an untrue and unverifiable claim—if you can find one place where the ACLU actually claims that the Constitution has a “sodomy clause” I will gladly apologize, but until then, claims that they say the Constitution has such a clause do not belong on this site.  (If you really want to criticize the ACLU there is plenty to criticize them for without making false accusations and you should feel free to do that).--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 12:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Reginod, thank you for your comments. I see your points. I have added my original section to the article on Godless: The Church of Liberalism, where they are more appropriate. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]</sup> 12:59, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Reginod, thank you for your comments. I see your points. I have added my original section to the article on Godless: The Church of Liberalism, where they are more appropriate. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]</sup> 12:59, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:::No problem Crocoite, sorry if I was a bit short with you in my reply, I just worry about getting painted with a broad “liberal” brush and having problems as a result.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:01, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
     
553

edits