Difference between revisions of "Talk:Elephant"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(mention that Colbert is why this vandalism is showing up... no need to explain at length, just revert)
(reword)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The article states that the population of elephants tripled from January to June in 2006.  As the gestation period of an elephant is 22 months, it would be impossible for the statement to be true.   
 
The article states that the population of elephants tripled from January to June in 2006.  As the gestation period of an elephant is 22 months, it would be impossible for the statement to be true.   
  
−
: Perhaps you're unfamiliar with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiality_and_Other_Tripling_Elephants Stephen Colbert's suggestion] that Wikipedia's articles regarding elephants be vandalized to include the mention of their population tripling in 6 months.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 14:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
+
: Just revert anything that remotely sounds like "the population of elephants have tripled in the last 6 months", it's clear-cut vandalism.  See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiality_and_Other_Tripling_Elephants Stephen Colbert's suggestion] for the background.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 14:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
 
This page does not reference any of its statements, and contains several that are patently untrue--a surprisingly large number for such a short article.
 
This page does not reference any of its statements, and contains several that are patently untrue--a surprisingly large number for such a short article.

Revision as of 19:01, March 31, 2007

The article states that the population of elephants tripled from January to June in 2006. As the gestation period of an elephant is 22 months, it would be impossible for the statement to be true.

Just revert anything that remotely sounds like "the population of elephants have tripled in the last 6 months", it's clear-cut vandalism. See Stephen Colbert's suggestion for the background. --Interiot 14:44, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

This page does not reference any of its statements, and contains several that are patently untrue--a surprisingly large number for such a short article. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence for the evolution of elephants, not from sea cows as stated in the article but from a common ancestor.

This should probably be merged with the page on Elephants (pl.) and forward to there, since that article is already longer and cited.