Difference between revisions of "Richard Dawkins and William Lane Craig"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In regards to [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[William Lane Craig]], William Lane Craig has said that Richard Dawkins's "argument for atheism is a failure even if we concede, for the sake of argument, all its steps. But, in fact, several of these steps are plausibly false. <ref>http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5493</ref> | In regards to [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[William Lane Craig]], William Lane Craig has said that Richard Dawkins's "argument for atheism is a failure even if we concede, for the sake of argument, all its steps. But, in fact, several of these steps are plausibly false. <ref>http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5493</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External Links == | ||
| + | *[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5493 Richard Dawkins' argument for atheism in The God Delusion?] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 23:41, May 6, 2010
In regards to Richard Dawkins and William Lane Craig, William Lane Craig has said that Richard Dawkins's "argument for atheism is a failure even if we concede, for the sake of argument, all its steps. But, in fact, several of these steps are plausibly false. [1]
