Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and Mass Murder"
(→Offensive?: feigned offense is used as a tool of censorship. Often the offense is fictional) |
(→Offensive?: reply) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:thedrunkencat|thedrunkencat]] | --[[User:thedrunkencat|thedrunkencat]] | ||
:We don't care if atheists are offended. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:32, 21 March 2010 (EDT) | :We don't care if atheists are offended. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:32, 21 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | Why not? | + | Why not? {{unsigned|Joaanes}} |
:Because the truth (and forgiveness) is a more important value than speculation about whether someone may be offended by it. | :Because the truth (and forgiveness) is a more important value than speculation about whether someone may be offended by it. | ||
:Also, feigned offense is used as a tool of [[censorship]]. Often the offense is fictional.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:03, 13 May 2010 (EDT) | :Also, feigned offense is used as a tool of [[censorship]]. Often the offense is fictional.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:03, 13 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Sorry for being so blunt. If atheists do not like the truth here well than they have hate for was is written. Should we care they're upset? No. We do care- just not how you want us to. We refuse to confirm you in your sin. We want your conversion and your rightful place in the afterlife, Heaven.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 23:19, 13 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:19, May 14, 2010
Anti-Theism and Mass Murder?
Not all communist were atheist. Stalin was an admitted deist, Hitler a self-proclaimed Catholic. They were both anti-theist (towards religion other than their own). This article should be renamed "Anti-Theism and Mass Murder"
- Hitler was an atheist and believer in evolution. He was also a proven liberal. Don't try and split hairs to support your liberal agenda. Open your eyes and embrace God! Myrobi 09:13, 27 February 2010 (EST)
"Who cares what liberals think?"
Personally, I found Malirin's contribution to this passage to be rather valid, and especially the first paragraph struck me as particularly well-written. The second paragraph could have used better wording. But to see this whole passage reverted with just a "Who cares what liberals think" saddens me. --Maquissar 22:05, 26 February 2010 (EST)
- Conservapedia is not a dumping ground for liberal and atheist apologetics and excuses. If readers really want that, they can head on over to wikipedia and drink their fill. DouglasA 22:46, 26 February 2010 (EST
Offensive?
Does it not occur to anyone that to suggest that to suggest that atheists are more likely to kill masses of people is offensive? Hitler was a very sick man, and everyone knows that, but it doesn't mean that every atheist is as sick as that. It is also constantly asserted that to disagree with this article means that the person disagreeing is automatically dumping their liberal agenda. There are plenty of religious liberal persons, as there are non-religious conservatives.
It must also be mentioned that there have been MANY killers of masses that were religious. --thedrunkencat
- We don't care if atheists are offended. --Jpatt 20:32, 21 March 2010 (EDT)
Why not? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joaanes (talk)
- Because the truth (and forgiveness) is a more important value than speculation about whether someone may be offended by it.
- Also, feigned offense is used as a tool of censorship. Often the offense is fictional.--Andy Schlafly 22:03, 13 May 2010 (EDT)
- Sorry for being so blunt. If atheists do not like the truth here well than they have hate for was is written. Should we care they're upset? No. We do care- just not how you want us to. We refuse to confirm you in your sin. We want your conversion and your rightful place in the afterlife, Heaven.--Jpatt 23:19, 13 May 2010 (EDT)