Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(username removed)
(added some examples and common expressions of when ignorance is deliberate.)
(Undo revision 786543 by KrisC (Talk) this is not a "liberals are" list, feel free to re-ad other examples)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say.
 
* [[Liberal Christianity|Liberal]] [[Cafeteria Christianity|cafeteria Christians]] refuse to consider [[Bible]] verses that contradict their preconceived notions of what the Bible should say.
 
* Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts.
 
* Liberal Internet discussion boards quickly delete posts that present facts contradicting liberal ideology and ban users making such posts.
−
* Liberals commonly refuse to acknowledge the crushing debts that accompany illegal immigration.
 
−
* Liberals refuse to acknowledge the negative health effects of homosexuality.
 
−
* Liberals almost never acknowledge the negative side effects of tobacco, drug, and alcohol use.
 
−
* Liberals praise communism as being somehow “viable”, but they adamantly refuse to hear that communism has lead to the unjustified deaths of millions.
 
−
* Liberals always take into the account the feelings of heinous criminals when it comes to capital punishment, but totally ignore the fact that unborn children can feel pain.
 
−
* Liberals ignore Obama’s utter unwillingness to deal with the Gulf of Mexico oil spill but will attack George W. Bush for anything he says or does. A general law regarding Obama is that if it is something that Bush would be endlessly chastised for, Obama will fly under the radar every time for it.
 
−
* Liberals are quick to jump at qualities of creationism that they feel are asinine, but completely refuse to believe that anything at all is ridiculous about monkeys transforming into humans (evolution).
 
−
* Liberals never acknowledge the obvious racist implications of evolution in general.
 
−
 
 
(add more)
 
(add more)
  
Line 33: Line 24:
 
* "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
 
* "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
 
* "That [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends me]]!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic)
 
* "That [[Logical_fallacy#Appeal_to_pity|offends me]]!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic)
−
* “My professor tells me something different!” (professor values)
 
−
* “Your argument is unconventional and therefore erroneous!” (used as an excuse to ignore strong arguments, usually in an informal debate setting)
 
−
 
  
 
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==
 
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==

Revision as of 20:58, June 10, 2010

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

(add more)

Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:

  • "I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by liberals[3])
  • "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look)
  • "I've never seen that in the New York Times!"
  • "That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!"
  • "Let's talk about something else!"
  • "I'm not interested in that!"
  • "They hate us for our freedom!"
  • "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
  • "That offends me!" (used as an excuse not to consider facts or logic)

Crime of Deliberate Ignorance

Deliberate ignorance can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."[4]

References