Difference between revisions of "Talk:YouTube"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '"Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars" This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars" This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of all liberal videos. Claiming that the majority is "poorly made" is just somebody throwing a tantrum. This is less of a conservapedia and more like an opinionpedia. - CWChandler
 
"Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars" This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of all liberal videos. Claiming that the majority is "poorly made" is just somebody throwing a tantrum. This is less of a conservapedia and more like an opinionpedia. - CWChandler
 +
::::All liberal videos are poorly made as they are not supported by reality. At best they are like donkey dung - Shiny on the outside, but not very pleasant on the inside. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:55, 27 June 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:55, June 28, 2010

"Liberal videos while often being poorly made, are usually rated at least 4 stars" This is a childish opinion. I can guarantee you that nobody bothered to find the actual mean of all liberal videos. Claiming that the majority is "poorly made" is just somebody throwing a tantrum. This is less of a conservapedia and more like an opinionpedia. - CWChandler

All liberal videos are poorly made as they are not supported by reality. At best they are like donkey dung - Shiny on the outside, but not very pleasant on the inside. conservative 20:55, 27 June 2010 (EDT)