Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marxism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
[[User:ComradeK|ComradeK]] 22:19, 17 April 2009 (EDT)
 
[[User:ComradeK|ComradeK]] 22:19, 17 April 2009 (EDT)
  
−
Would anyone mind if I put any actual marxist theory in this article? Its all about Soviet history, with a very very brief glimpse of anything remotely relating to Marxism itself
+
== Add Theory? ==
  
−
[[User:LuxemburgFTW|LuxemburgFTW]] 18:22 April Your mother 2999
+
Would anyone mind if I put any actual marxist theory in this article? Its all about Soviet history, with a very very brief glimpse of anything remotely relating to Marxism itself [[User:LuxemburgFTW|LuxemburgFTW]] 18:22 April Your mother 2999
 +
 
 +
:Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:30, July 18, 2010

Not Appropriate

I think this article doesn't show how evil marxism is and gives the impression that it is a good thing, can someone please write about how marxism has hurt the world? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jesusbushcheney (talk)

The article is not locked. HelpJazz 14:07, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

Marxism, as a political view point, is not evil. However those who warp it, such as Stalin, are.

ComradeK 22:19, 17 April 2009 (EDT)

Add Theory?

Would anyone mind if I put any actual marxist theory in this article? Its all about Soviet history, with a very very brief glimpse of anything remotely relating to Marxism itself LuxemburgFTW 18:22 April Your mother 2999

Gosh I see all kinds of explanations of the theory in the article, but it is not locked, and I look forward to your improvements. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 20:30, 17 July 2010 (EDT)