Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michelle Obama"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Fashion Disaster?: new section) |
(→Fashion Disaster?: reply) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Perhaps you might want to cite some of the "fashion disaster" claims, especially since her favorite designer has done quite well since Michelle became first lady. Also, if you're going to argue that she is a fashion disaster, then you might not want to do it next to a picture of her looking fashionable and stately! [[User:DanieleGiusto|DanieleGiusto]] 13:44, 2 August 2010 (EDT) | Perhaps you might want to cite some of the "fashion disaster" claims, especially since her favorite designer has done quite well since Michelle became first lady. Also, if you're going to argue that she is a fashion disaster, then you might not want to do it next to a picture of her looking fashionable and stately! [[User:DanieleGiusto|DanieleGiusto]] 13:44, 2 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :You may think that Michelle looks fashionable and stately, most people disagree. Anyway, added refs and a new pic.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:52, 3 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:52, August 3, 2010
A good balanced rational article, tho' it does need more information.
Court Ordered Inactive Status by a Disciplinary Agency
Was Michelle Obama disbarred? [1] Rob Smith 12:22, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
"Savior" in Bold
Why is the word "savior" in bold? It seems clear that the quote explicitly warns against viewing any one person (including Obama) as a savior. --Economist 22:37, 24 July 2009 (EDT)
Fashion Disaster?
Perhaps you might want to cite some of the "fashion disaster" claims, especially since her favorite designer has done quite well since Michelle became first lady. Also, if you're going to argue that she is a fashion disaster, then you might not want to do it next to a picture of her looking fashionable and stately! DanieleGiusto 13:44, 2 August 2010 (EDT)
- You may think that Michelle looks fashionable and stately, most people disagree. Anyway, added refs and a new pic.--Jpatt 00:52, 3 August 2010 (EDT)