Difference between revisions of "Talk:National Lawyers Guild"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Conservative, let's celebrate our very first agreement and wipe it clean. Calling any group a pack of commies is slanderous.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 21:24, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | : Conservative, let's celebrate our very first agreement and wipe it clean. Calling any group a pack of commies is slanderous.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 21:24, 1 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::I disagree | + | ::I disagree regarding your "calling any group a pack of commies remark". I just think a Sysop like RobS should follow the websites rules and cite his sources. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:26, 1 April 2007 (EDT)conservative |
Revision as of 01:27, April 2, 2007
I have many friends in the NLG, one of them a decorated former army sergeant; it is not a communist front. If there are no citations for these egregious lies and slanderous statements, I will delete them.-AmesGyo! 21:03, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
where are your sources?
Where are your sources? This article has little credibility and I am more conservative than many at this board. Here is what the conservapedia commandments state: "Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain". Conservative 21:22, 1 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
- Conservative, let's celebrate our very first agreement and wipe it clean. Calling any group a pack of commies is slanderous.-AmesGyo! 21:24, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- I disagree regarding your "calling any group a pack of commies remark". I just think a Sysop like RobS should follow the websites rules and cite his sources. Conservative 21:26, 1 April 2007 (EDT)conservative