Difference between revisions of "Talk:Counterexamples to the Bible"
(reply to 3 points) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Also, the creation story says that light was created first. Light is not possible without a spacetime manifold, which was not created at that time. | Also, the creation story says that light was created first. Light is not possible without a spacetime manifold, which was not created at that time. | ||
The population of the earth is much too large too soon after the flood. Assuming 8 humans survived the flood, every woman over 15 years old would have to have 50 children to produce a large enough population by the time of the Exodus from Egypt. (Assuming: the flood was in the year 3000 BC, and the Exodus was in 2500 BC). And, even assuming this is possible, it does nothing to address the sudden rise of different races. | The population of the earth is much too large too soon after the flood. Assuming 8 humans survived the flood, every woman over 15 years old would have to have 50 children to produce a large enough population by the time of the Exodus from Egypt. (Assuming: the flood was in the year 3000 BC, and the Exodus was in 2500 BC). And, even assuming this is possible, it does nothing to address the sudden rise of different races. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I have an open mind about it. Let's take a look at your arguments: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: The First Law of Thermodynamics says that energy may be transformed from one type to another, and it is all the time. That's what creation presumably was. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: See [[Counterexamples to Relativity]], which is a far longer list than [[Counterexamples to the Bible]]. Perhaps the goofy "spacetime manifold" never really existed. Are you open-minded about that? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I'm surprised by your population argument, because I've seen analysis that says the population levels today are just what one would expect from having just a few people in 3000 BC.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:20, 11 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:20, August 12, 2010
No counterexamples to the Bible?
Doesn't this become tautological if you are unwilling to consider counterexamples? TylerGD 10:17, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- The "counterexamples" you posted were repeatedly brought up over the years by atheists, agnostics, and the generally dimwitted over the course of thousands of years; and these "counterexamples" were repeatedly proven wrong. That's "Proven" with a capitol "P". Karajou 10:27, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- Sorry, I must have missed something. Which counterexamples did TylerGD post? If they have all been Proven wrong with a capital P, shouldn't this article address them and state why they are wrong, as with every other counterexample here, instead of just not considering them? --MarcoT2 11:48, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- The page history contains the edits here. I found the alleged "counterexamples" to be remarkably trivial and non-substantive. Our entries here are substantive, and will remain so.--Andy Schlafly 11:59, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- Ok, I understand this necessity. I agree that only the MAJOR counterexamples should be addressed! Thank you, anyway, for posting the link to the edits. --MarcoT2 12:01, 11 August 2010 (EDT)
- What should happen is a separate article titled Alleged Biblical contradictions, detailing the passages, what liberals have against them, and why the contradictions don't exist in the first place. Karajou 12:05, 11 August 2010 (EDT
How about the First Law of Thermodynamics? This states that energy may not be created or destroyed, which contradicts Genesis. Also, the creation story says that light was created first. Light is not possible without a spacetime manifold, which was not created at that time. The population of the earth is much too large too soon after the flood. Assuming 8 humans survived the flood, every woman over 15 years old would have to have 50 children to produce a large enough population by the time of the Exodus from Egypt. (Assuming: the flood was in the year 3000 BC, and the Exodus was in 2500 BC). And, even assuming this is possible, it does nothing to address the sudden rise of different races.
- I have an open mind about it. Let's take a look at your arguments:
- The First Law of Thermodynamics says that energy may be transformed from one type to another, and it is all the time. That's what creation presumably was.
- See Counterexamples to Relativity, which is a far longer list than Counterexamples to the Bible. Perhaps the goofy "spacetime manifold" never really existed. Are you open-minded about that?
- I'm surprised by your population argument, because I've seen analysis that says the population levels today are just what one would expect from having just a few people in 3000 BC.--Andy Schlafly 20:20, 11 August 2010 (EDT)