Talk:Origins debate

Your requested feedback

Ed,

I took quite a bit of time to try to respond to your request for feeback. Unfortunately, it was all lost due to a computer snafu.

Here is the Reader's Digest version.

1. I suggest having User:Phillip J. Raymont a Sysop so he can edit the page which will probably get protected as this page will likely be a edit war battlezone and the panel will decide its direction. He may know more about the history of the debate than I do.

2. I think you need more footnotes.

3. I don't think this page should become a Theory of evolution article. We already have one.

4. I am against a Aspects of evolution article as it seems by its title to assume that macroevolution occurred. Maybe its just a title problem.

5. I suggest reading these links and reading the WSJ article:

http://members.shaw.ca/mark.64/hcib/whowins.html

http://www.ankerberg.com/Articles/science/SC0104W1E.htm

Here are some links which show that biblical creationism is growing around the world and gives some history of the debate:

http://www.biol.andrews.edu/issues/Hist.Creat.Lec

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/religion/revolution/1980.html

http://www.cbn.com/spirituallife/BibleStudyAndTheology/Perspectives/colson020722.asp

Conservative 08:55, 2 April 2007 (EDT)conservative